Last modified by robert on 2026/08/12 13:08

From version 117.1
edited by robert
on 2026/08/12 12:50
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 115.1
edited by robert
on 2026/06/29 08:23
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -106,9 +106,7 @@
106 106  
107 107  [[HERE>>http://auspass.edu.au/field/NODES_blank_fieldlog.pdf]] is an example logsheet that works well for nodes, feel free to print and use!
108 108  
109 -== 2. Burial ==
110 -
111 -== 3. Node Placement ==
109 +== 2. Node Placement ==
112 112  )))
113 113  
114 114  **Site Analysis**:
... ... @@ -117,12 +117,12 @@
117 117  * Take photographs from various angles to document the site setup thoroughly. Have a colleague stand next to it pointing at it.
118 118  * Include a detailed site description in your notes.
119 119  
120 -== 4. GPS Considerations ==
118 +== 3. GPS Considerations ==
121 121  
122 122  (% class="wikigeneratedid" %)
123 123  The GPS antenna is at the top and center of the unit, and will (usually) only receive signal with a clear sky view directly above. The signal is able to penetrate plastic and terracotta planters and a thin (2 cm?) layer of soil, but may struggle if the soil layer is too thick. **These nodes will not start recording without attaining a GPS lock** and repeated attempts will excessively drain the battery.
124 124  
125 -== 5. Visibility and Location Marking ==
123 +== 4. Visibility and Location Marking ==
126 126  
127 127  **Flag Placement**: Position a flag, preferably in a bright color (avoid green or yellow), near the instrument to aid in its future location.
128 128  
... ... @@ -131,11 +131,12 @@
131 131  * Use a GPS device to mark the instrument's exact location. Most modern cell phones can get to about a 3m error with their internal GPS also; you can probably also get away with investing a few dollars in a good app that shows error and lets you log markers.
132 132  * Also write the GPS down on paper (ie your [[LOG SHEET>>http://auspass.edu.au/field/NODES_blank_fieldlog.pdf]]).
133 133  
134 -== (% style="color:inherit; font-family:inherit; font-size:max(18px, min(20px, 14.4444px + 0.462963vw))" %)6. Charge Time, Pre-Deployment & Post-Deployment(%%) ==
132 +== (% style="color:inherit; font-family:inherit; font-size:max(18px, min(20px, 14.4444px + 0.462963vw))" %)5. Charge Time, Pre-Deployment & Post-Deployment(%%) ==
135 135  
136 136  * **Charging Duration**: Both types of nodes take approximately 6-8 hours to fully charge from a flat state.
137 137  * **Pre-Deployment Charging**:
138 138  ** Although the nodes hold their charge well, it's beneficial to give them a "top up" charge before deployment.
137 +
139 139  * **Operational Duration**:
140 140  ** When recording at 250 Hz, with GPS on and Bluetooth disabled, the instruments are expected to last about 30 days per charge cycle. If they are set to run only overnight, this can be extended to 60 days.
141 141  
... ... @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@
150 150  ** Charge levels for transport will be advised by the freighter. The required SoC will depend on volume and transport method (air, land, sea).
151 151  
152 152  (((
153 -== 7. Data Sharing and Metadata Creation ==
152 +== 6. Data Sharing and Metadata Creation ==
154 154  )))
155 155  
156 156  **GPS Data**:
... ... @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@
165 165  
166 166  * Create and organize metadata according to the [[ANU metadata standard txt file>>attach:example_metadata.txt]]. This is going to be particularly important if you are reusing nodes at different sites... not documenting the serial numbers (of the **top half** of the node) and the times they were deployed can lead to station mix-ups.
167 167  
168 -== 8. Additional Best Practices ==
167 +== 7. Additional Best Practices ==
169 169  
170 170  * **Training and Familiarisation**: Make sure all team members are adequately trained in using the GPS devices, compass use, and other equipment to ensure consistent and accurate data collection.
171 171  
... ... @@ -435,6 +435,9 @@
435 435  
436 436  We are aware that there are various different published responses for these instruments and trust very few of them. One has to be careful with how polarity is handled between groups as well, and if one is working in integer counts (the ANSIR default) or mV (unclear why anyone would use this as it makes file sizes enormous). The response information published below is in **counts** and seems to fit well in huddle tests. Note that the response is the same for all channels and all units (e.g. there are no bespoke calibrations!), all appear to be sample rate insensitive, and the IGU data has been inverted (multiplied by -1) as described here: [[5Hz Node Polarity Issues>>https://auspass.edu.au/xwiki/bin/view/Data/AusPass%20Data/#HSmartSoloNodePolarityIssues]]
437 437  
437 +(% class="wikigeneratedid" %)
438 +//A small note on the y-axis scale of the following plots: We are aware that raw velocity is typically scaled ~~1e-6. This data has been filtered and selected for especially quiet regions so has lower amplitude. The key point is showing the match with the known CMG-6TD and Centaur data.//
439 +
438 438  == IGU 16HR-3C ==
439 439  
440 440   '16HR3C': {'poles':[(-22.211059+22.217768j), (-22.211059-22.217768j)],
... ... @@ -442,15 +442,15 @@
442 442   'gain':1,
443 443   'sensitivity': 257019225.55108312}
444 444  
445 -[[X axis is samples (.01 s), Y axis is velocity (m/s), 0.5-5 Hz filter>>image:16HR_Z_huddle.png||alt="IGU16_Z_huddle.png"]]
447 +[[X axis is samples (.01 s), Y axis is velocity (m/s), 0.5-5 Hz filter>>image:IGU16_Z_huddle.png]]
446 446  
447 -[[X axis is samples (.01 s), Y axis is velocity (m/s), 0.5-5 Hz bandpass filter>>image:16HR_N_huddle.png||alt="IGU16_N_huddle.png"]]
449 +[[X axis is samples (.01 s), Y axis is velocity (m/s), 0.5-5 Hz bandpass filter>>image:IGU16_N_huddle.png]]
448 448  
449 449  == IGU 16-1C ==
450 450  
451 451  The 1C nodes seem to have the same response as the 3-channel IGU-16HR-3C (above), however the response posted at IRIS-NRL seems to imply that there is no poles and zeros information (e.g. a flat/linear response). This is 100% not so.
452 452  
453 -[[IGU-16 1C, X axis is samples (.01 s), Y axis is velocity (m/s), 0.5-5 Hz bandpass filter. Seems to be same response as IGU-16HR-3C.>>image:16HR1C_Z_huddle.png||alt="IGU16_1C_Z_huddle.png"]]
455 +[[IGU-16 1C, X axis is samples (.01 s), Y axis is velocity (m/s), 0.5-5 Hz bandpass filter. Seems to be same response as IGU-16HR-3C.>>image:IGU16_1C_Z_huddle.png]]
454 454  
455 455  == BD3C-5 ==
456 456  
... ... @@ -466,7 +466,7 @@
466 466  [[X axis is samples (.01 s), Y axis is velocity (m/s), 0.5-5 Hz bandpass filter>>image:BD3C_N_huddle.0.5.png]]
467 467  
468 468  (% class="wikigeneratedid" %)
469 -Below the corner frequency (0.2 Hz) the phase response still fares well, but amplitude response may need to be dialed in a bit (it seems a bit high). We are working to try to calibrate this a bit better. In the next two figures the filter is **0.1** to 5 Hz:
471 +Below the corner frequency (0.2 Hz) the phase response still fares well, but amplitude response may need to be dialed in a bit (it seems a bit high). In the next two figures the filter is **0.1** to 5 Hz:
470 470  
471 471  
472 472  [[BD3C **0.1 **to 5 Hz bandpass filter>>image:BD3C_Z_huddle.0.1.png]]
16HR1C_Z_huddle.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.robert
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -92.1 KB
Content
16HR_N_huddle.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.robert
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -88.4 KB
Content
16HR_Z_huddle.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -XWiki.robert
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -80.8 KB
Content
BD3C_N_huddle.0.1.png
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -65.9 KB
1 +72.1 KB
Content
BD3C_N_huddle.0.5.png
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -68.4 KB
1 +73.3 KB
Content
BD3C_Z_huddle.0.1.png
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -64.3 KB
1 +52.1 KB
Content
BD3C_Z_huddle.0.5.png
Size
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -52.5 KB
1 +64.6 KB
Content
XWiki.XWikiComments[0]
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Mark Goldman
Comment
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -I can verify that the default orientation for the SmartSolo 3C nodes is positive values for case motion to the South, West, and downwards. We have co-located nodes with permanent stations and noticed this correlation when comparing waveforms.
Date
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -2026-07-09 10:45:51.967