Skip to Content
Last modified by robert on 2026/06/29 16:42
From version 115.1
edited by robert
on 2026/06/29 08:23
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 113.1
edited by robert
on 2026/06/17 17:14
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -434,9 +434,6 @@
434 434  
435 435  We are aware that there are various different published responses for these instruments and trust very few of them. One has to be careful with how polarity is handled between groups as well, and if one is working in integer counts (the ANSIR default) or mV (unclear why anyone would use this as it makes file sizes enormous). The response information published below is in **counts** and seems to fit well in huddle tests. Note that the response is the same for all channels and all units (e.g. there are no bespoke calibrations!), all appear to be sample rate insensitive, and the IGU data has been inverted (multiplied by -1) as described here: [[5Hz Node Polarity Issues>>https://auspass.edu.au/xwiki/bin/view/Data/AusPass%20Data/#HSmartSoloNodePolarityIssues]]
436 436  
437 -(% class="wikigeneratedid" %)
438 -//A small note on the y-axis scale of the following plots: We are aware that raw velocity is typically scaled ~~1e-6. This data has been filtered and selected for especially quiet regions so has lower amplitude. The key point is showing the match with the known CMG-6TD and Centaur data.//
439 -
440 440  == IGU 16HR-3C ==
441 441  
442 442   '16HR3C': {'poles':[(-22.211059+22.217768j), (-22.211059-22.217768j)],