Changes for page AusPass Data
Last modified by robert on 2025/08/21 13:37
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -46,14 +46,16 @@ 46 46 47 47 Soon we will also begin hosting regionally specific catalogs with full phase picks. 48 48 49 -= SmartSolo Node Z Polarity bug = 49 += SmartSolo Node Z Polarity bug (IGU-16HR only) = 50 50 51 -In late 2023 it was discovered that the vertical Z channel of allSmartSolo nodes is actually inverted relative to the standard expectation of "positive up" (vertical axis dip = -90). EarthScope's solution was to add a -1 multiplier to the //response data.// Because we have a much smaller volume of this data to fix, and far less of it already distributed prior to this announcement, we have opted to do the opposite; e.g. we invert the //raw data// because the data is what is wrong; not the response.51 +In[[ late 2023 it was discovered>>https://epic.earthscope.org/content/smartsolo-archives-flipped-polarity-igu-16hr-3c-5hz]] that the vertical Z channel of **the IGU-16HR short period **SmartSolo nodes is actually inverted relative to the standard expectation of "positive up" (vertical axis dip = -90). EarthScope's solution was to add a -1 multiplier to the //response data.// Because we have a much smaller volume of this data to fix, and far less of it already distributed prior to this announcement, we have opted to do the opposite; e.g. we invert the //raw data// because the data is what is wrong; not the response. 52 52 53 +**Until very recently we also thought that the BD3C-5 "broadband" nodes had inverted data by default, but now understand that their raw exported data has the correct polarity.** 54 + 53 53 As such, 54 54 55 55 {{warning}} 56 -Do not mix up EarthScope's or the IRIS-NRL node response data with those available at AusPass. Theirs willlikelybeinvertedrelative to our data!58 +Do not mix up EarthScope's or the IRIS-NRL node response data with those available at AusPass. Theirs could be inverted relative to our data! We also strongly suspect that the response information at IRIS-NRL is not correct either. In general we have low confidence in the information provided but can confirm that our metadata is at least "pretty close". 57 57 {{/warning}} 58 58 59 59